tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6920271329589936347.post1424330745426258188..comments2023-04-25T11:15:08.515-04:00Comments on Science & Religion Today: Still No Consensus on Shroud of Turin's AgeHeather Waxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15610116462331794810noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6920271329589936347.post-36787994409496540142008-08-21T13:17:00.000-04:002008-08-21T13:17:00.000-04:00Good posting. I was at the Ohio conference. There ...Good posting. I was at the Ohio conference. There is little question about the fact that the samples tested by the Los Alamos team, 27 fibers in all taken from the carbon dating sample region, are not part of the shroud. <BR/><BR/>As for the Jackson carbon monoxide contamination theory, none of the chemists or physicists there took it very seriously. <BR/><BR/>The next big player will be Christopher Ramsey of Oxford. Yes, he will examine Jackson's work. But he is also taking the Los Alamos work, Rogers' work and the sampling problems seriously.<BR/><BR/>ThanksAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com